Trail & hunters
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, Dec. 21, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Because I live minutes from the Montour Trail in Jefferson Hills, walking on the trail has been something my dogs and I have enjoyed for more than a year now. We walk there almost every day.
During archery season, we saw hunters everywhere, standing behind trees. As if that was not bad enough, now there are hunters with guns in plain sight.
I believe hunting safety-zone regulations say hunters must be 25 yards away from the trail. I think that is way too close to the trail, which is supposed to be for walkers, runners and bicyclists!
I know hunters are not to shoot across the trail, but I certainly don't trust that if they had a shot at a deer, they would pass it up. I understand that the deer population needs to be thinned out. However, there are enough places to hunt where there are not walkers and dogs off leash.
I really think “no hunting” signs should be properly posted there. Or maybe they should post “walk at your own risk during hunting season” signs!
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Medicaid’s future
- Slots & property taxes
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Math in common?
- Putin’s actions I
- Drought answer?
- Not reviled abroad
- What competition?
- Obstacles to hiring
- Orwellian redefinitions