The Constitution & Ten Commandments
I was born in Connellsville General Hospital and graduated from Connellsville Senior High. As an American and former U.S. Army soldier, I enjoy the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. Those freedoms would not be possible without the Ten Commandments.
We trace the Western legal tradition (from which the Constitution came out of) to the founding of the Judeo-Christian ethic. Through the millennia, this gave birth gradually to concepts such as equal justice under law, limited government, and a system of checks and balances, because the Founders understood the nature of man. Fallible man must not be given absolute power, because absolute power corrupts absolutely. Put another way, it allows man's true nature to come out.
Other than the fact that the Ten Commandments were given by God, and are therefore important in the sense that all scripture is given by God and inspired, the Ten Commandments do not bear special religious significance to me as a Christian outside of their symbolic significance as symbols of the foundation of our country.
Thus, the Ten Commandments have both religious and secular significance. They are significant as one very important root of our government. If our young people do not understand where we have come from as a nation, they will not be able to understand where we are going.
This is why the secular progressives want to force their removal.
Rev. Ewing Marietta
The writer is pastor of Liberty Baptist Church in Uniontown.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Corbett, not Wolf
- Working hard in fast food
- Not man for job
- Justices behaving badly
- Boys, girls & toys
- ‘Badges’ before Brooks
- GCC 19, sportsmanship 0
- Failing to lead
- Lying time of year
- Corbett, the reformer
- GOP: Integrity