ShareThis Page

School boards' role

| Monday, Dec. 16, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

The Baldwin-Whitehall School Board finds itself in a time of transition and unfortunate scrutiny. After recently ending my eight years of board service, I am responding to legitimate concerns voiced to me by many.

My voting privileges were not in effect for these controversial matters. Had I been able, I would have voiced strong opposition to hiring a district employee with a reporting structure outside the superintendent's jurisdiction, his level of compensation and a five-year contract for a newly created position.

While the board's actions are an aggressive departure from its entrusted roles, perhaps more serious than an ongoing character debate is the urgent imperative to restore definition to the role of a school board. While relationships between boards and administrations vary, the National School Boards Association (NSBA) points out that successful boards act as stewards that review and adopt policies, align resources and monitor progress. The superintendent leads as CEO, with more concrete responsibilities for daily operations and execution of strategic initiatives.

It's not uncommon, even with the best intentions, for the lines to blur, and confusion about these roles has a negative effect on a district. According to the NSBA, boards that attempt to circumvent superintendents are divisive and disruptive.

Superintendent Randal Lutz and the Baldwin-Whitehall professional staff have clear vision and goals focused on student experience, high academic achievement and effective operations.

The new board is a strong team of volunteers with diverse expertise united by an unwavering commitment to student success. However, even the most experienced leaders must remain mindful of mission, especially during times of controversy.

While opinions on any issue will always vary, I think it's important for the board to carefully consider residents' outcry and listen closely to their concerns.

George L. Pry


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.