Government as Grandma
So, Carlino Giampolo says in his column “A new paradigm for Oakland” that Mayor-elect Bill Peduto's status “will not be determined by the number of jobs created or the amount of revenue raised, but by the quality and quantity of the caring and love he gives to this community in the name of ending injustices.”
How cute: Government as Grandma. How fitting for the baby talk that now takes the place of public discourse and for the nanny state we have become.
Mr. Giampolo needs a civics lesson, and fast. There may very well be a need for more caring and love in this community, but that has absolutely nothing to do with government. Look to family, friends, church, and if you have none of those; look to counseling, but don't saddle the mayor's office with the generation of love and caring when it's lucky it can clear snow. As for ending injustices, that's what laws and the judicial branch are for.
I long for the day when those in any branch of government at any level will look at the mess they have created somewhere (Pittsburgh Public Schools and the August Wilson Center come to mind) and say, “We've really screwed this up; it's not what we do well, so we're getting out of it.” That's the caring I'm looking for.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Seek ‘post-combustion future’
- View from Florida
- Hazardous ride
- Terrorism & immigration
- Follow King’s words
- Rethink NFL fandom
- More simply put
- AG’s office no place for porn
- Finally, like Bush
- Hope for spinal cord injuries
- Puzzling trend