Proud of Connellsville
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Dec. 27, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
I was born and raised in Connellsville, and I have been following Laura Szepesi's recent articles with a great deal of pleasure. I am glad to see the old photos, read about the vitality of the Connellsville I grew up in, and read the interviews (which, incidentally, includes my aunt).
One article mentions that “the long list of 1940s' Connellsville businesses is amazing” and it truly was. Connellsville's past is rich with history and, in my opinion, a real slice of Americana. Growing from the frontier Mud Island visited by George Washington to a melting pot for travelers from around the world, thriving in the Industrial Revolution, suffering through decline, and then re-inventing itself as is characteristic of the American spirit, Connellsville is an indomitable town with good people as its backbone.
I graduated from Connellsville Area High School in 1975 and went off to college to discover that I was just as prepared, if not more so, than classmates from much bigger cities. The school's continued accreditation by the Middle States Association through all these years attests to the value of the educational system.
I certainly cannot complain about the education I received; it helped me earn a bachelor's degree and a master's degree in petroleum engineering, and I am now a petroleum engineering consultant in charge of assessing the oil and gas reserves of Saudi Aramco.
Thanks for publishing these articles, and I look forward to more.
Charles R. Vanorsdale
Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Our nation’s testing obsession
- Putin’s actions I
- Obstacles to hiring
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Putin’s actions II
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Math in common?
- Not reviled abroad