Share This Page

Buffer zones critical

| Wednesday, Dec. 25, 2013, 9:01 p.m.

As an obstetrician-gynecologist, I support legislation introduced by state Sen. Larry Farnese, D-Philadelphia, that would establish a 15-foot buffer zone around reproductive health clinic entrances in Pennsylvania (“Philadelphia senator's bill restricts anti-abortion protesters,” Dec. 12 and TribLIVE.com).

This is already existing law in Pittsburgh, and women all across the state should enjoy this protection from harassment by anti-choice protesters. All Pennsylvania women deserve protection to access legal and safe medical services, including abortion, without being subject to intimidation.

I have worked at health clinics without such buffer-zone protections and witnessed the aggressive intimidation tactics of protesters. I have seen protesters threatening to hurt women's families, photographing and harassing clinic staff, and lying to women about the safety of abortion and other clinic services.

No person, man or woman, should have to suffer fear of harassment simply for walking into a reproductive health clinic. Buffer zones in the City of Pittsburgh provide critical protection and this proposed legislation will help protect all women in Pennsylvania.

Christy Boraas

Swissvale

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.