Share This Page

Highmark-UPMC sideshow

| Friday, Dec. 27, 2013, 8:57 p.m.

I'm a Highmark Blue Cross/Blue Shield customer who is sick and tired of seeing and hearing commercials for the two biggest squabbling-like-brats corporations in the area: Highmark and UPMC.

It is infuriating and uncomfortable to sit through a popular former KDKA-TV anchor's recent commercial extolling the benefits of UPMC over Highmark. It is not informative but appears intended to scare people.

For crying out loud: Grow up! Act like the adults you supposedly are.

These commercials are inane, boring and infuriating. If they were meant to be informative, they might advertise pricing differences in, perhaps, diagnostic testing, instead of such scare tactics.

Why hasn't the state insurance commissioner locked representatives of both parties in a dark, hot, windowless cell with stale bread and water for sustenance until they come to an acceptable-to-patients agreement?

Why has state government permitted these two megaliths to force doctors to choose one company over the other and to remove from insurance networks hospitals and treatment centers that are close to patients' residences?

Somebody, please, get a gag order for both companies until they correct “the problem.”

Marylou Anderson

McCandless

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.