Taxable minimum wage
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Dec. 20, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
Congress needs to raise the minimum wage. No one can live on $7.25 per hour.
The new minimum wage should be at least $25 per hour. A $52,000 per year income would be livable.
All of the people on the $25 minimum wage will need the increased wages to pay the taxes for the millions added to the food stamp rolls, the extended unemployment compensation for the millions of people who still cannot find work, the billions in green-energy jobs that never materialized, health care for all those who have lost their health insurance from the “un”-American “un”-Affordable “un”-Care Act, the unfunded liabilities projected for Social Security, and for the bailouts of our once great cities like Detroit and Chicago.
The “free stuff” has to be paid for by someone and, once the $25 minimum wage is law, the government can tax those earning the raised minimums for their “fair share.”
We should give thanks to President Obama for America's version of Chairman Mao's “Great Leap Forward,” demonstrating once again what happens when big government and progressives care about the poor.
The only question that remains is: What will a Happy Meal cost?
David A. Scandrol
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Resurrection? Yes, really
- Knives vs. guns I
- Knives vs. guns II
- Bloomberg & coal
- Sign on to save Springdale
- In tragedy’s wake I