A tale of gas taxes
Regarding the item in “The Thursday wrap” about the upcoming increase in Pennsylvania's gasoline taxes: I used to live in Connecticut, which, as you know, is not a very large state. The tax on gas in Connecticut made the cost about 25 cents a gallon higher than in Massachusetts.
So, once or twice a week, I'd drive 5 miles to a gas station over the state line to fill up, along with all the other customers with Connecticut tags.
Then, some Einstein in the Connecticut revenue department said, “We're losing money because people are driving out of state to get gas. We need to make up that revenue. We need to raise the tax on gasoline.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Banding helps birds
- Incomprehensible hatred
- Ignorant on marriage
- Clueless on law
- Off base on Chatham prez
- Extension agent remembered
- Good kids
- Worth the sacrifice
- Rhetoric & reality
- Restore royalty minimum
- Buffer zones needed I