Fix America, not Afghanistan
Our Congress has given Afghanistan's government $96 billion in taxpayer money to rebuild the country and did the same in Iraq. How can Congress justify doing this when we have so many problems with our own country and economy? Why does Congress give so much foreign aid, but cut programs at home and overtax the middle class?
This Congress definitely is the worst I can remember. All it's done for 10 years is fight and oppose each other on everything. Then the tea party came along and now nothing gets done.
Why do we go into these countries, blow them to kingdom come, then pay to fix them up? We need to take care at home.
What's really alarming is how much of that $96 billion ends up in Afghan politicians' pockets and the hands of the rebels.
Congress acts like some kind of big charitable organization. It's sickening the taxpayers have to foot the bill for all of this mismanagement.
The father of our Constitution, James Madison, said in 1794, “Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government.” Do you hear that Congress?
The only recourse is to vote them out of office, but then the next group does the same thing.
Congress needs to start earning those huge salaries. Talk about inept job performance.
God help us — he's the only one we can trust.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Corbett is the honest choice
- Inconsistent Wolf
- Gross in 45th
- Corbett over Wolf I
- Corbett over Wolf II
- Watson in 33rd
- Barbour sentence shameful
- The Catholic foundation