The Baldwin-Whitehall School District has recently been in the spotlight because one person, in one evening, with all but one vote of a school board, handed out a newly created, unfunded position of power with a lucrative payout. This action, while beyond my comprehension, has caused members of the district community to snap their necks and gather together to say that enough is enough.
Newspaper and television reports have fed the disbelief and fueled the anger of a district of hardworking, honest people. But from every bad situation comes good. People have banded together for a common cause; they are demanding transparency and asking questions.
What are the ideal conditions for effective school board service to the community? Why do we have policies and procedures if they are not followed?
We would like to see a spirit of harmony, respect and cooperation among board members and toward the community. In light of recent actions, we would like to see school directors not use their position to benefit themselves.
Finally, our district touts zero tolerance toward bullying behaviors. The standards we hold our children to are to be modeled by the adults in our community. For a respectful relationship to exist between our board and the community, name calling must cease; it is juvenile and an extreme defense mechanism.
As the new year begins, let the Baldwin-Whitehall community continue to move forward toward a respectful, open, involved spirit when it comes to our school board. Who knows, we may just get the same in return.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Good riddance
- ‘Coyote Capitalism’
- Beware this Wolf II
- Legalize all
- Reverse red-kettle ban I
- Reverse red-kettle ban II
- Punishment pushback II
- Don’t blame bus drivers II