ShareThis Page

Freedom above control II

| Friday, Jan. 17, 2014, 8:57 p.m.

Well, people are very excited about the ability to purchase “weed” lawfully in various states, including Colorado. The issue with these marijuana distribution centers is that it is still a federal offense for banks to accept money from these “stores” because the federal government does not recognize these state laws fully.

States are going to attempt to pass some laws to allow these places to have legal bank accounts within their states — basically, trying to legalize a form of money laundering. Just like illegal drug sales, these are cash-only businesses.

Now, when it comes to drug legalization, I'm very libertarian. Make them all legal. I don't smoke weed, and if it was legal, I still wouldn't.

It's not like people who already partake are having issues gaining access to it. But the “progressive” way that marijuana is being introduced to the masses is the issue. Until the states can govern themselves without massive federal mandates, these movements will continue to have issues.

Those on the left only want freedom when it benefits them, which is why the libertarian movement is the only true freedom movement. Liberty or death. Don't tread on me.

Justin J. Bandurski


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.