By The Tribune-Review
Published: Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
In the news story “Before work begins, Pittsburgh Mayor-elect Peduto parties with friends” , mention was made that Bill Peduto was looking for “change” in his years as the new mayor of Pittsburgh. While I think Peduto will do a good job and I wish him well, I'm puzzled about what he actually means by “change.”
For the most part, Pittsburgh has been run by the Democratic Party. The previous mayor was a Democrat, too, as is the entire City Council. So, what are we changing? Are we to become more liberal, more moderate or more conservative?
Perhaps we are going to “change” from being one of the “most livable cities” in the USA to something less! Are we changing the platform and ideals of the Democratic Party? Oh boy, can't touch that! I think “change” is an overused word that many elected officials use — a nice word to say, but what does it really mean? Perhaps Mr. Peduto can enlighten us.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Medicaid’s future
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Slots & property taxes
- Putin’s actions I
- Obstacles to hiring
- Conspicuous by absence
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Funding priorities questioned
- Proven success
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Math in common?