NK-A spending unsustainable
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Tuesday, Jan. 14, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
The New Kensington-Arnold School Board can — if it chooses — increase our taxes by 3.1 percent for 2014-15. The board has raised taxes for the last three years (1.4 percent in 2011-12, 2.5 percent in 2012-13, and 4.6 percent in 2013-14).
This is unsustainable. We will soon be one of the most heavily taxed districts in Westmoreland County.
The board says this pays for quality education, which I might understand it if our test scores were good, but they're not. I want to know what justifies this tax increase.
We don't have the tax base to keep funding the board's mistakes. I'm not criticizing the newly elected board members — they have their hands full. It's the old guard. Just look at the spending over the last six years.
Our community needs to stand up and say “No!” to this spending. When election time comes, we need to vote in new people. We need fresh blood that thinks out of the box instead of bilking the taxpayers.
What happens when people can no longer afford to pay their school taxes and simply leave? We'll end up with more vacant houses that need to be torn down — yet another cost to our struggling cities.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Telling facts
- Budget & business taxes
- Corbett’s choice
- Strong enough
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Invest in pre-K
- Islam & women
- Ukraine & history
- Obama & Reaganomics II