Obama & Christie
Let me see if I've got this straight. To name just a few of the numerous scandals that someone in the Obama administration is responsible for:
• The “Fast and Furious” scandal, in which guns were sent to Mexico and ended up killing at least one American and an untold number of Mexicans.
• The IRS selectively sorting out, auditing and harassing organizations that worked against Obama's re-election.
• The NSA listening in and recording telephone and electronic media communications between private citizens.
• The Benghazi disaster, where reinforcements were told to stand down and four Americans were killed.
In these and other scandals, Obama denied any knowledge of them, sometimes saying he just read about them in the paper. That means he is either a totally inept leader or he's lying again.
For the most part, these scandals have faded away unresolved. Few perpetrators were identified, no one was fired and in one case an alleged perpetrator was promoted.
And Obama goes on his merry way to the next Hawaiian vacation or round of golf. No big deal.
But New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie discovers wrongdoing in his administration, then identifies and fires the perpetrator. Then he calls a news conference, accepts responsibility and apologizes profusely to the public.
It has been a top story since it broke earlier this month, a criminal investigation has been initiated and we are being told that his political career has been destroyed.
The scandal? Causing a traffic jam.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Corbett, the reformer
- Failing to lead
- Sheetz-CVS hearing
- Science on fracking’s side
- Not for expressway
- Far-left continuation
- He’ll tax, we’ll pay
- ‘Badges’ before Brooks
- Renaming in order?
- Echoing Pelosi
- Confidence in our courts