NFL is anti-Pittsburgh
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Wednesday, Jan. 15, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
Re. the article “Rooney prepared for offseason of change” (Jan. 9): Whether Coach Mike Tomlin's mistake for being on the field in the Ravens game was intentional or not, he paid his fine. Now, the NFL is still looking to punish the Steelers with the loss of a draft pick. Ultimately, the decision will fall upon NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell.
The current kangaroo court of the NFL was implemented by longtime Commissioner Pete Rozelle and history showed his great dislike for the Steelers. It is also a fact that the Steelers are the most unjustly scrutinized team in the NFL.
The New Orleans “headhunters” and New England's “Spygate” didn't result in the loss of draft picks. Those acts jeopardized players' careers and showed standardized cheating versus the possible effect on one game's outcome. So where is the parity in punishment, Mr. Goodell?
The Steelers can't expect a fair shake from a league that has proven it's anti-Pittsburgh. Whatever does happen, we will hold our heads high because we are a “city of champions” and that is what champions do.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Telling facts
- Budget & business taxes
- Strong enough
- Corbett’s choice
- Islam & women
- Don’t override the mayor
- Guzzardi for guv
- Tarentum’s ‘questionable practices’
- Springdale’s dysfunction
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Invest in pre-K