TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Wrong on voter ID I

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Thursday, Jan. 23, 2014, 8:55 p.m.
 

Commonwealth Court Judge Bernard McGinley struck down the photo ID requirement contained in the 2012 Pennsylvania voter ID law. His rationale? It “unreasonably burdens the right to vote.” Unreasonably ? To whom?

Let me tell you something, judge. The right to vote comes with a certain amount of responsibility — researching candidates, understanding issues, forming an opinion and showing up to vote on Election Day. And if not by photo ID, I ask you, how is a poll worker supposed to verify that voters are who they say they are? Fingerprints? Retinal scans? DNA analysis?

Seems to me that photo ID is a simple solution. If you want to vote badly enough, you'll find a way to get an ID.

Come on, Judge McGinley. You can do better for the law-abiding, responsible voters of Pennsylvania. Reverse your decision.

Tim Walters

White Oak

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Wolf an ideologue
  2. Obama’s legacy
  3. Henry L. Molinaro, R.I.P.
  4. Be fiscal stewards
  5. Thanks to Cookies
  6. Protecting taxpayers
  7. Training for what?
  8. Lack of foresight
  9. In good hands
  10. Mt. Lebanon residency embarrassing
  11. Piling on Hempfield