TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Wrong on voter ID I

Daily Photo Galleries

Thursday, Jan. 23, 2014, 8:55 p.m.
 

Commonwealth Court Judge Bernard McGinley struck down the photo ID requirement contained in the 2012 Pennsylvania voter ID law. His rationale? It “unreasonably burdens the right to vote.” Unreasonably ? To whom?

Let me tell you something, judge. The right to vote comes with a certain amount of responsibility — researching candidates, understanding issues, forming an opinion and showing up to vote on Election Day. And if not by photo ID, I ask you, how is a poll worker supposed to verify that voters are who they say they are? Fingerprints? Retinal scans? DNA analysis?

Seems to me that photo ID is a simple solution. If you want to vote badly enough, you'll find a way to get an ID.

Come on, Judge McGinley. You can do better for the law-abiding, responsible voters of Pennsylvania. Reverse your decision.

Tim Walters

White Oak

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Biased? Guilty as charged
  2. It’s not personal
  3. ‘Food fight’ lamentable
  4. More than one hero
  5. Zionist view
  6. Comprehensible failures
  7. Cockpit safety stalled
  8. Expecting we’ll pay
  9. Despair & chaos
  10. UMW fighting EPA regulations
  11. Gas industry obfuscates the truth
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.