TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Wrong on voter ID I

Daily Photo Galleries

Thursday, Jan. 23, 2014, 8:55 p.m.
 

Commonwealth Court Judge Bernard McGinley struck down the photo ID requirement contained in the 2012 Pennsylvania voter ID law. His rationale? It “unreasonably burdens the right to vote.” Unreasonably ? To whom?

Let me tell you something, judge. The right to vote comes with a certain amount of responsibility — researching candidates, understanding issues, forming an opinion and showing up to vote on Election Day. And if not by photo ID, I ask you, how is a poll worker supposed to verify that voters are who they say they are? Fingerprints? Retinal scans? DNA analysis?

Seems to me that photo ID is a simple solution. If you want to vote badly enough, you'll find a way to get an ID.

Come on, Judge McGinley. You can do better for the law-abiding, responsible voters of Pennsylvania. Reverse your decision.

Tim Walters

White Oak

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. ‘Affordable’? Not for him
  2. Arnold’s garbage
  3. ATI’s broken promises
  4. Pass GMO label bill
  5. PNC: New roles for helpers
  6. Wrong on immigration I
  7. Protesters not law-abiding
  8. Report reactions III
  9. R.I.P., Joe Paterno
  10. Incumbents’ edge?
  11. Cameras not the answer
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.