On the right road
The recently adopted transportation-funding package gives much needed support to business, tourism and agriculture across the state. This bill includes $35 million for the Dirt and Gravel Road Program, which benefits local townships and boroughs in funding environmentally sound road-maintenance projects.
Armstrong County has 1,041 sites identified as needing improvements on 498 miles of roadway. The Armstrong Conservation District has been administrating the road program here since 1996. The program was created through the help of Trout Unlimited.
Townships and boroughs are the beneficiaries of the program. Municipalities that own roads and are responsible for their maintenance can apply to the conservation district for funding. To date, 189 projects totaling $3 million have been completed in Armstrong County.
Roads are being improved for farmers and foresters to more easily get their products to market. Tourists get access to more remote areas on safer roads. By addressing sediment pollution sites on roads near our streams, anglers will be able to enjoy Armstrong County's excellent fishing opportunities.
This funding helps upgrade our area roads, resulting in improved access and efficiencies in the areas we live. Furthermore, the work for these dirt and gravel road projects is typically contracted locally, which boosts our economy.
The infusion of dollars in this transportation-funding package is a win for all Armstrong County residents. If you would like to learn more about the Dirt and Gravel Roads Program, visit www.dirtandgravel.psu.edu/, or you may contact the Armstrong Conservation District, Dirt and Gravel Roads specialist, at 724-545-3610.
The writer is district manager for the Armstrong Conservation District.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Not man for job
- Working hard in fast food
- Corbett, not Wolf
- Justices behaving badly
- ‘Badges’ before Brooks
- Workers must earn higher pay
- He’ll tax, we’ll pay
- Re-elect Evankovich
- Failing to lead
- Miss Penney’s catalog
- Corbett, the reformer