Still giving back
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Sunday, Jan. 26, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
I read the news story “North Huntingdon man's autobiography to benefit Westmoreland food bank” concerning Jim Shirley, who is donating the proceeds from his book to the Westmoreland County Food Bank. This does not surprise me in the least, as Mr. Shirley has been giving back to the community for years. I can personally attest to this fact.
When I was 16, some 44 years ago, I got into some trouble. Back then, when a young person would go astray, the police would call on an organization they had formed, in cooperation with a group of concerned citizens, that would mentor troubled youths rather than send them to juvenile hall. Jim was a part of that group and I was assigned to report to Jim.
He would give me jobs to do around his funeral home, paid me a wage and would even feed me at lunchtime. He encouraged me to do well in school and served as an example I looked up to. I never got into any more trouble after that, finished high school and went on to serve in the Army and also my community.
So, here's to the life and times of Jim Shirley as I look forward to the next chapter of his continuing contributions to the community.
Thomas G. Krause
The writer is a North Huntingdon Township commissioner.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Ukraine & history
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’
- Funding priorities questioned
- Proven success
- What competition?
- We pay to keep poor warm
- Conspicuous by absence
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Behavior counts
- Guzzardi for guv