By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, Feb. 1, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
There you go again, VND — yet another anti-union editorial ( “Another union racket: End It With HB 1507” ).
The VND's corporate parent, Trib Total Media Inc., has disliked unions for as long as I can remember. It has long supported right-to-work (for less) laws and supported enacting them in Pennsylvania.
House Bill 1507 would eliminate payroll deductions of union dues for workers. This legislation was inspired — and is being used as retaliation — by anti-union forces. These people hate the continued support from unions for better wages for everyone, including nonunion workers.
The supposed reason to support this bill is to “protect” union workers from having their union dues used for political purposes. This is hogwash. You don't hear very many union members complaining about their dues being used to protect them in Washington and Harrisburg.
Union dues paid for my training as a USW legislative activist in Washington, and it was money well spent. I attended weekly meetings at AFL-CIO headquarters and received information on the coming week's anti-union legislation.
So when the VND says unions are bad, don't put any trust in it. The paper doesn't support the average worker.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Knives vs. guns I
- Knives vs. guns II
- Bloomberg & coal
- Resurrection? Yes, really
- Bike lanes welcome
- Read it & decide
- Sign on to save Springdale
- The Obama Doctrine I wonder …
- Tragedy sensationalized