Catch cat killer
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Tuesday, Feb. 4, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
Re. the story “Fawn police seek answers in animal abuse” (Jan. 30) about the cat tortured and killed by hanging on a tree: As I look at my beloved pet cat sleeping in a warm house on a soft sofa with a full belly, my heart breaks for the cat in that article. What has this world come to?
When I read Police Chief Tim Mayberry's comment — “This could be kids being stupid” — I was disgusted and shocked. If a kid did this, it is far from an act of stupidity — it's a symptom of mental illness. That kid is a time bomb waiting to go off. I doubt a fine or jail time would stop this kid from continuing on that same path.
This person needs a mental health evaluation. If an adult committed this crime, the police have an even bigger problem.
We all remember serial killer Jeffery Dahmer's history of animal torture and killings. I sincerely hope the authorities do everything in their power to catch this predator.
Whoever committed this horrible crime will most likely end up telling someone, as to brag.
Everyone needs to keep his eyes and ears open. If the community works with the authorities, they should be able to make an arrest.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Bloomberg & coal
- Knives vs. guns I
- Knives vs. guns II
- Resurrection? Yes, really
- What would Ben say?
- Tragedy sensationalized
- Dingell’s lesson
- Consequences in space