Obama's visit costly
On Jan. 29, the president landed at Pittsburgh's 171st Refueling Wing en route to a photo op at U.S. Steel's Irvin Works in West Mifflin to announce his newest initiative. He arrived from Washington via his private 747 accompanied by fighter jets, a transport plane containing two limousines, various Secret Service vehicles, equipment, etc.
He traveled to the Allegheny County Airport near the plant and back to the 171st via Marine One, escorted by a Sikorsky helicopter and three Osprey aircraft. From the county airport, he was whisked to and from the plant by a contingent of local, county, state and federal law enforcement agencies including the FBI, Secret Service and Homeland Security. After a signing ceremony, speech and tour he was on his way with his entourage back to the 171st and on to another destination.
No accounting of the cost of his visit has been offered, but I would venture it would exceed the total of all the income tax that I, my parents, my grandparents and all my friends and their families have paid in their lifetimes. Personally, I would have liked to have kept my share of that money for my own purposes.
I believe a big-screen TV with the message delivered via Skype would have sufficed. Just think how much his “carbon footprint” could have been reduced, something I know he is greatly concerned for all of us to work on, if only he would have been aware that there was actually an alternative to this cumbersome trip.
Clifford J. Warner
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- EPA not the problem
- Law applies to drillers, too
- Trophy shot trumps learning
- Speak up on illegals
- It’s supposed to be a ‘holiday’
- EPA impoverishing seniors
- ‘Change’ promise kept
- Enforce immigration laws
- Family first
- For their own benefit
- Thankful this holiday