New farm bill
New farm bill
The 2014 Farm Bill provides stability for farm families as they make food production decisions now and for years to come.
The new farm bill includes a much stronger crop insurance program that should help farmers purchase enough insurance to better protect themselves from severe losses due to extreme weather disasters. It should also encourage additional farmers who have not acquired crop insurance in the past to do so.
More than 79 percent — nearly $4 out of every $5 in farm bill spending — supports the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which funds food stamps and other food nutrition programs. Crop insurance accounts for 9.4 percent, conservation programs for 6 percent, commodity programs for 4.6 percent and 0.9 percent for other areas.
Pennsylvania dairy farmers, who are the fifth largest producers of milk in the United States, will also have an opportunity to reduce their overall risk through a new dairy gross margin insurance program. The goal of the margin insurance program is to provide more stability to an industry with historically volatile milk prices and extremely tight profit margins.
Carl T. Shaffer
Mifflin Township, Columbia County
The writer is the president of the Pennsylvania Farm Bureau.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ATI crying poor again
- EPA, methane & health
- Buyer beware
- Stop naming shooters
- Give Vick second chance
- Cops, stars shine
- e_SSLqProgressive’ should be ‘regressive’
- Personal fiscal restraint needed
- Overgrown North Versailles property needs attention
- ‘Climate clucker’ & proud
- Council actions questioned II