The NFL wants to extend its season. What season? We don't have sports seasons anymore.
It used to be that baseball was “the boys of summer” and ran until Labor Day. Then football took over until January. Hockey started in late fall. If you've seen clips of old Stanley Cup games, they are dated in late January. Basketball used to be over in March. March madness ended the season.
But not anymore. The sports seasons all run together with baseball being played during football season when it's snowing and hockey in the summer and basketball seemingly all year long. How can fans and cities support these teams without a break? Families can't afford the cost.
The NFL wants to expand the season but can cities afford to do that? Cities are going bankrupt. Maybe Roger Goodell hasn't read the papers or seen the news. They can't afford to pay their policemen or firemen or offer basic services to their residents and now the NFL wants to enlarge the number of teams in the league. Is the NFL going to pay cities to do that?
The players' salaries are also unbelievable. How many policemen, firemen, waitresses or hotel workers make $15 million a year? There was a story about investigations into six-figure pay to firefighters for overtime. I think we have to re-evaluate our priorities — six figures to put their lives on the line or millions to entertain us?
I haven't read “The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire” but it seems like that's where we are headed with the Super Bowl becoming circus maximus with Roger Goodell as Caesar.
We don't need expansion. We need to repair and restore what made this nation great. My old standby line: Let's get back to basics!
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.