Helping out Newport students
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Feb. 20, 2014, 8:55 p.m.
In December, Newport Business Institute and Oakbridge Academy of Arts closed their doors without warning, leaving students seemingly no way to complete their educations.
Because of the tireless efforts of certain individuals, former Newport students have a choice. They may finish their education and receive degrees or certificates or pursue other options.
Since we all were at various stages of our educations, creative solutions had to be devised. In my case, some very special people come into play:
• Mike Choma, the former dean and a proud 38-year instructor, made it his personal mission to take care of every student.
• Two committed instructors, Carla Shank and Carol Silvis, worked with the Private Industry Council and CareerLink to create a completion plan for me. Thanks to their efforts, two of us will receive our certificates from the Pennsylvania Department of Education. PIC and CareerLink also provided a facility to complete our education.
• PIC and CareerLink staff, including Rick O'Domes, Debbie Colosi, Bill Thompson, Tammy Croyle, Olga Nonn and the office employees made us feel welcome.
We were within two months of completing our studies when the owners abruptly shut down, leaving us devastated. If not for the combined efforts of all the above-mentioned dedicated professionals, we would not be on our way to successful careers.
Judy L. Dudek
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Medicaid’s future
- Slots & property taxes
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Guzzardi for guv
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’
- Our nation’s testing obsession
- Putin’s actions I
- Good use of slots money