If I had not read it with my own eyes, I would have considered it just about inconceivable that the Trib, that very same Trib owned by a descendant of Judge Thomas Mellon and that regularly publishes columns by Walter Williams and Thomas Sowell, could have also published the front-page news story by Christopher S. Rugaber of The Associated Press headlined “Low inflation's ugly side? Weak economy” .
Does the editor of the front page understand what is often (alas, not always) written on the Opinion page? Does the editor of the front page read the Opinion page? Can the editor of the front page even read? Why does the owner permit this inconsistency, let alone drivel, to appear?
I know that the editors of the Opinion page are familiar with Bastiat, Mises, Williams and Sowell. How can this happen? Geez!
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Self-serving & corrupt
- Rushing to judge
- LED sign: Negative ad
- Bring back ‘eagle cam’
- Foley & Obama I
- Foley & Obama II
- Better school security
- Detail military cuts
- Blame misdirected
- Missing WJAS
- The ‘Tree of Agitation’