Tarentum's 'questionable practices'
At the Feb. 17 Tarentum Council meeting, a taxpayer asked why a former constable, Tim Dzugan, who is awaiting trial on theft charges, was transferred by the borough from code enforcement to the street department.
Tim Rapp, who despite being charged recently with stealing from his employer remains council president, would not comment. The new borough solicitor, David Regoli, stated that personnel matters like Dzugan's are not discussed at public meetings.
The condescending arrogance of certain Tarentum officials and employees and their blatant dismissal of taxpayer concerns should not be tolerated. A reminder to all: The taxpayers fund all salaries and wages.
Have questionable practices and disrespect and apathy for “the little guy” become the rule of law in Tarentum? Sadly, it seems so.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Bible under attack
- Voting insanity
- Postal questions
- Family first
- Gruber, then & now II
- Gruber, then & now III
- Gruber, then & now I
- Enforce immigration laws
- Improve yourself, improve your pay
- Quarantine quandary
- Hypocrisy & B’nai B’rith