Share This Page

Sovereignty trampled

| Sunday, March 2, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

As a Kenyan living in Pittsburgh, I found President Obama's statements regarding Uganda's anti-gay bill a classic case of the rich bullying the poor. By vowing consequences from his government should Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni sign the bill (which he has since done), Obama was making it clear that poor people have no rights — no right to their own decision-making, no right to preserve their own unique cultural identity.

Obama needs to understand that Africa is very different from the West in its norms and culture, and trying to acquire a global uniform culture is to lose our own identity as Africans. For Obama to threaten relations with Uganda because he disapproves of its decision is hitting below the belt and appalling. But he can, because the U.S. gives foreign aid to poor countries in Africa.

It is my hope that Americans will be moved to defend the rights of nations (even poor ones) to retain their sovereignty in decision-making. If powerful nations need to approve of every decision made by poorer nations, we are in effect saying that poor people have no rights.

Grace Kihumba

Point Breeze

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.