'We the people' are veterans
We the people — does that sound familiar? How about, we the veterans, the men and women who have stepped up and served our country since 1776. We must step up and fight for our country once again.
We have been sitting idly while the U.S. Congress sinks us further into debt and despair. We hear in the news that we must make sacrifices to preserve our nation.
But here's what Congress does:
• Continues foreign aid — trying to buy friends.
• Gets loans from China so we can provide foreign aid.
• Sells weapons to countries we give foreign aid to so we can get some money back.
• Doesn't cut welfare costs.
• Cuts veterans benefits.
• Wants to cut Social Security and Medicare benefits — making “we the people” pay more.
• Wants to cut the military budget. Any coach can tell you the best offense is an even better defense.
Who are “we the people”?
• We are the veterans of World War II, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan.
• We are those veterans who have reached the age of Social Security and Medicare.
• We are the veterans preparing for war again — not with guns, but with votes.
We are 2 million strong in Pennsylvania and we will not vote for those in Congress who continue to sink our country into debt and despair.
Whose side are you on?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Incomprehensible? That’s Obama
- Not taxpayers’ responsibility
- Punishment pushback I
- Punishment pushback II
- Help for Tina
- Don’t blame bus drivers I
- Don’t blame bus drivers II
- Youth & work ethic
- Leaders unaccountable
- No ground troops
- Beware this Wolf II