| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Strong enough

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Letter to the Editor
Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Strong enough

The Trib and its columnists are overreacting to the military cuts proposed by Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel. He isn't calling for unilateral disarmament. The U.S. is the strongest military power in the world and will still be strongest if those cuts are made.

The U.S. spends far more on its military than any other country. The Pentagon's annual budget is more than twice what China, Russia and Iran combined spend on their armed forces. It still will be if Hagel's cuts are enacted.

And the U.S. has more active military personnel than any other country except China. The personnel reductions that Hagel has proposed — about 40,000 out of over 1 million — won't change that.

But before saying what size the military should be, let's first decide what it's to be used for. Do we want to play world policeman, engage in nation-building, fight other countries‘ civil wars and impose Jeffersonian democracy on tribal warlords? Then we'll need to increase both spending and manpower.

But even with the cuts that are being called for, the U.S. will still have armed forces more than strong enough to defend the U.S. from military attack and protect our strategic interests and allies abroad.

Really, isn't that enough?

Thomas Gillooly

Forest Hills

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Catholicism & science
  2. Major issue, no action
  3. Not one-sided
  4. States & secession
  5. Outrageous & delusional
  6. USW not cause of ATI woes
  7. Bright lines: Budget battle
  8. Inspiring & welcome
  9. ‘Deflategate’ fault NFL’s
  10. Seal the borders
  11. More health-care control