So much for diversity
Regarding the news story “Going coed often only option” : Chatham University, an all-female undergraduate university, is considering going coed for its undergraduate programs and is being met with resistance from its alumnae. Other all-female colleges and universities have also met with such resistance while contemplating going coed.
I find it amazing that these alumnae — who want everyone else to accept diversity — will not readily accept diversity themselves.
These are the same women who cry foul about inequality in pay, inequality in opportunity, inequality for women in every aspect of life. Yet they do not want to have equality thrust upon their beloved institution.
Discrimination is taught firsthand in Chatham University's undergraduate programs every day by disallowing diversity in its classrooms. What is even more amazing is that these alumnae are out in the world, assuming leadership roles with this type of discriminatory educational background.
Diversity is not a one-way street. It can be successful only when everyone wanting it has a broader vision themselves.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- e_SSLqProgressive’ should be ‘regressive’
- Personal fiscal restraint needed
- Producers, consumers hurt
- Grand Grandview
- Don’t blame the union
- Coal’s health hazards
- Confederate pride: Why?
- Overgrown North Versailles property needs attention
- Cops, stars shine
- Of a Fine man & friend
- Trump beats status quo