Destroying middle class
Destroying middle class
Into the sixth year of ideological rather than economic policy, America finds its middle class decimated by its self-anointed champions: Barack Obama and the Democratic Party.
Taxation, regulation and legislation have killed jobs and income. The labor participation rate is at a 35-year low.
With food stamps, disability and welfare at record highs, Obama and his party demand amnesty for 12 million illegal aliens — further depressing wages and job opportunities for the unemployed.
As the EPA shuts down coal plants and kills thousands of high-paying jobs by fiat, the “crony capitalist in chief” forces the middle class to subsidize his “Big Green” campaign donors' billion-dollar pursuit of green “unicorns” amid solar-powered windmill farms at the expense of the U.S. economy. The rest of us get $4-a-gallon gas and skyrocketing energy bills.
Exploding heath-care costs and premiums, along with the requisite tax increases courtesy of ObamaCare, further erode middle-class budgets and standards of living while “quantitative easing” monetary and zero-interest-rate policies decimate savings and inflate all household goods.
As surely as liberalism births failure, liberalism seeks a scapegoat. In Orwellian fashion, the impotent GOP is the designee.
If the devil's greatest trick is convincing the world he does not exist, the political equivalent is Democrats' propagandist sleight of hand, anointing themselves protectors of the middle class — while methodically dismantling and destroying it.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Reverse red-kettle ban II
- Good riddance
- Reverse red-kettle ban I
- Not taxpayers’ responsibility
- Punishment pushback I
- Incomprehensible? That’s Obama
- Punishment pushback II
- No ground troops
- Don’t blame bus drivers II
- Legalize all
- Leaders unaccountable