| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Scary stance

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Tuesday, March 18, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

I read the letter “Strong enough” by Thomas Gillooly regarding our military spending. It didn't take long to realize that he is deeply partisan, defending this administration's proposed action of cutting our military.

Gillooly claims our military budget is “more than twice what China, Russia and Iran combined spend on their armed forces.” Combined? I tried to confirm his assertions, but he appears to have some resource unobtainable by others.

Questions for you, Mr. Gillooly: Where did you get those military spending amounts? What source provided you those numbers? How did you find the accurate amounts that China, Russia and Iran spend on their militaries? Please provide your sources so we can all be as informed as you.

Then he describes our military as a “world policeman” engaged in “nation-building” and imposing “Jeffersonian democracy on tribal warlords.” What on Earth are you talking about, Mr. Gillooly? Could you provide us proof of this claim?

It's very scary when someone like Gillooly starts spewing misinformation (lies) while Islamic fascists and rogue nations covering the globe have a sole desire to destroy us! To me, it's abundantly clear that he is an individual who would read this (or any opposing response challenging his claims), then mutter to himself: “What difference does it make?”

Robert Nanovsky

Ligonier Township

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Vitriolic opinion
  2. Animal-friendly bill
  3. Jesus’ resurrection
  4. America, shame & love
  5. Disrespectful  deceit
  6. Curious priorities
  7. Undeserved ridicule
  8. Clean up food programs
  9. Deer debate continues II
  10. Deer debate continues I
  11. Deer debate continues III