I'm writing this letter on the eve of the Burrell girls basketball game vs. Seton LaSalle in the PIAA semifinals. That's because I don't want this letter to sound like sour grapes after the Lady Bucs have lost.
The PIAA needs to stop private schools with no geographic borders from dominating the sport of basketball in Pennsylvania. It is not a fair playing field.
It's no coincidence that three Seton LaSalle starters play on the same AAU basketball team all summer and go to the same private school. It happens at a school without borders.
How much do privates dominate basketball? Just check who is playing for PIAA titles tomorrow and Saturday.
Some people say teams without borders should play in the highest classification. I say we go “back to the future.” Years ago, private schools had a separate league, but the PIAA absorbed them after many closed. Now, there's abundance of charter schools, which draw from a region. The charters and private schools could easily combine to establish a league.
If the PIAA does not want to do this, the public districts need to get a spine and secede from the PIAA and form the PPSIA, the Pennsylvania Public School Interscholastic Association. Then borders — and playing for your hometown — will have their proper meaning again. Even at the high school level money talks and when you see a private school play a public school, there is much more support for the public school team. It's time to put the PIAA's feet to the fire or get out.
And congratulations to the Burrell players and coaches — the best public school girls basketball team in Pennsylvania.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.