Uniting against blight
Allegheny County is undergoing a renaissance. But one major issue is holding us back: blight.
Blight forces townships and boroughs to spend millions of dollars every year dealing with abandoned, tax-delinquent, dilapidated properties. It's money that can't be used to renew our communities. That's why I was so glad to see the news story “Mon Valley land bank efforts intensify” about a proposed land bank, which looks more and more like an effective tool to combat this problem.
Due to economic, political, legal and market forces, the process of returning blighted and abandoned properties to productive use is often slow, expensive and inconsistent. Instead of the current hodgepodge of hurdles and red tape, a land bank would be a one-stop shop for residents and businesses that want to partner with community members to improve our neighborhoods.
The Turtle Creek Valley, Steel Valley and Twin Rivers councils of governments are working together to an unprecedented degree because we think a land bank is a critical tool in the fight against blight.
The problem of blight isn't limited by municipal boundaries. The solution can't be, either.
The writer is executive director of the Turtle Creek Valley Council of Governments (tcvcog.com).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Trophy shot trumps learning
- Speak up on illegals
- EPA not the problem
- The real big spenders
- Law applies to drillers, too
- Gruber, then & now I
- Ambrosini’s logic lacking
- Give thanks for vets
- Can’t go it alone