Hindered by Hollywood
So, who benefits from the filming of movies in downtown Pittsburgh? Certainly not the small-business owners whose businesses are decimated during the time that movies film.
Without compensation, movie filming blocks off access to our places of business and limits foot traffic to our establishments. Of course, the city grants variances for sidewalk use, parking anywhere on the streets and closing streets and alleys used by small businesses for delivery.
I can only expect that the Pittsburgh Film Office is compensated in many ways. The film production company is subsidized via tax credits created and paid for through tax dollars — my and my business's and employees' tax dollars.
The public safety individuals are compensated and, of course, Haddad's is compensated for services it provides for movie crews, and the people employed to drive and work on the movies are compensated. All good for those people; they are working and deserve it.
Yet, my little restaurant and jazz club suffers with each movie filming in Pittsburgh, with little or no compensation.
I am working also, as are my servers and musicians. We earn on bodies in the seats.
When you make it difficult for our customers to get to us, we can't earn!
Elias P. Kazas
The writer owns and manages Mahoney's Restaurant and Little E's Jazz Club on Liberty Avenue.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- PETA & its tactics II
- Being a volunteer firefighter
- Uncaring toward soldiers
- PETA & its tactics I
- New Kensington block party thanks
- Bad cartoon
- Comprehensible failures
- ‘Food fight’ lamentable
- UAW won in Tennessee
- Biased? Guilty as charged
- It’s not personal