Share This Page

End daylight saving time

| Wednesday, March 26, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

This business with spring forward/fall back with the clocks has to go. It is very disruptive — changing the clocks, people being early or late, cows not wanting to give milk.

Some research shows the change to daylight saving time can be blamed for an increase in heart attacks during the first few days afterward.

Hawaii and parts of Florida, Indiana and Arizona don't participate. Imagine how confusing that is for travelers. Russia and even some Third World countries were smart enough to end the time changes.

Here's a simple solution: Move the clocks back just one half-hour this fall and leave them. A half-hour isn't going to make much of difference.

The argument that the change saves energy doesn't fly. What difference does it make if you turn on the lights and air conditioning in the morning or at night?

Let's have a referendum — put it on the ballot and let the voters decide.

If you agree that daylight saving time problems could be eliminated by the half-hour change, tell your congressman you want this issue to be on the ballot in November.

Pat Condelli

New Kensington

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.