| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Get the facts on Colfax

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Wednesday, March 26, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

The Allegheny Valley School Board has been discussing the future of Colfax Elementary School since 2006. At that time, the estimated cost for renovating the school was $5.8 million.

The costs were identified in a Feb. 2 VND article and did not include estimated costs for:

• Exterior accessibility renovations under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

• Classroom renovations.

• An upgrade to the kitchen facilities, which we can expect the Allegheny County Health Department to require.

Excluding these costs from a renovation estimate is not prudent fiscal management. A decision to renovate Colfax should be based on a 2014 cost estimate, not one from 2006.

Business Manager Brian Rau has stated the AVSD will have a $1.8 million deficit for the 2016-17 school year.

The district has a five-year, $6.2 million facilities plan. Utilizing that money for Colfax would severely limit any upgrade to other district facilities.

There also has been discussion about using money from the technology budget and retirement funds to pay for renovations. That's robbing Peter to pay Paul.

We've heard some board members saying, in essence, “We're going fix Colfax no matter what the cost. If someone doesn't like it, too bad.” The arrogance of these statements should anger our residents because these members were elected to represent them.

I ask the board to explore all options, based upon both the financial and educational aspects of the situation, and not make decisions that are going to cost more money than we need to spend.

James T. Marsili


Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Hike tobacco tax
  2. Unfit either way
  3. Build opportunity instead
  4. Month of sighs
  5. Feel safer?
  6. Unions fire back II
  7. ATI abandoned its own
  8. Bright lines: Signing Vick
  9. Unions fire back I
  10. ‘Climate clucker’ & proud
  11. Council actions questioned I