Cover for speculators?
Regarding The Associated Press news story “Rising prices make breakfast hard to swallow” : All of a sudden, food prices are set to rise due to “global supply problems,” drought and disease. Sure looks like a cover story for the food speculators on the commodities market to fleece the food-consuming public.
These scoundrels are motivated by greed and are worse than welfare cheats or bank robbers. The difference is that they have the law on their side, which permits them to engage in legalized thievery. Of course, they rationalize their activities by saying they are indispensable (whatever that means) to the functioning of the market, as if the commodities would not be sold to people who intend to use them — as if, for instance, people would decide not to eat food.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- PETA & its tactics II
- Why the difference?
- Pa.’s ‘safety laws’
- No ‘pass’ for Obama
- Right to veto
- Arnold must cut police force
- Today’s technology
- PETA & its tactics I
- Least GM can do