TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Debating LEED's worth II

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Thursday, March 27, 2014, 8:55 p.m.
 

As The New York Times reported five years ago, LEED-certified buildings often suffer from poor energy efficiency. I agree with the editorial “LEED certification: Big Green's lie” on that point.

LEED certification belongs on the blueprints, not the building itself. A new building should demonstrate efficiency for several years after it is occupied before a plaque gets attached. Prove it — then earn the gold star.

Regardless of your opinion on environmental issues, there is nothing wrong with doing a good job on energy design.

Efficiency is a long-term investment strategy that reduces costs throughout a building's long life. It is a strong bet that energy costs will continue to rise over the long term, increasing the initial value as the years go by.

The LEED program has earned constructive criticism. The LEED goals of quality, craftsmanship and frugality are American virtues we all share.

David Bangley

Hanover Township

Beaver County

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Bright lines: Supreme Court’s same-sex marriage ruling
  2. History lesson
  3. Drilling’s benefits
  4. Confederate flag flap I
  5. Ban police radar
  6. ATI should appreciate workers
  7. Confederate flag flap II
  8. Pension pain
  9. Few buy Confederate flags
  10. Confederate flags & violence
  11. Lincoln Way difficulties