TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Debating LEED's worth II

Daily Photo Galleries

Thursday, March 27, 2014, 8:55 p.m.
 

As The New York Times reported five years ago, LEED-certified buildings often suffer from poor energy efficiency. I agree with the editorial “LEED certification: Big Green's lie” on that point.

LEED certification belongs on the blueprints, not the building itself. A new building should demonstrate efficiency for several years after it is occupied before a plaque gets attached. Prove it — then earn the gold star.

Regardless of your opinion on environmental issues, there is nothing wrong with doing a good job on energy design.

Efficiency is a long-term investment strategy that reduces costs throughout a building's long life. It is a strong bet that energy costs will continue to rise over the long term, increasing the initial value as the years go by.

The LEED program has earned constructive criticism. The LEED goals of quality, craftsmanship and frugality are American virtues we all share.

David Bangley

Hanover Township

Beaver County

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. ‘PC’ Ebola approach deadly
  2. Find hilarity in the headlines
  3. Behind tax inversions
  4. Export more oil
  5. Vandergrift killing Olmsted’s vision
  6. Opposed to efficiency?
  7. Coal’s biggest threat
  8. Won’t stop drilling
  9. Far-left continuation
  10. Kennedy, not Roosevelt
  11. Better choice
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.