Kiski board ignores taxpayers
We are once again witnessing the power of our school board — the consolidation of our schools and our children. The citizens of Parks Township are voicing their collective discontent and largely being ignored.
The Kiski Area School Board collects millions of dollars from us, but our taxes disappear down the black holes of pension and salary increases. We've seen senior citizens with tears in their eyes stand before the board members begging them not to raise taxes because they're being forced from their homes. But the board disregards every word.
Laurel Point Elementary School has proven beyond a doubt it does not take extravagant facilities to educate children. It's a national Blue Ribbon School and now the board wants to close it.
Laurel Point is an ideal location for continued use. It can be remodeled, expanded or maintained as is. That can be accomplished with local skilled labor. It should also be considered as a satellite facility in the county.
Do we really need a guidance counselor in every school? A basketball court in every school? A swimming pool?
America is a representative republic. This means we elect officials to do the bidding of the people. The school board works for us — not the other way around.
It's time for term limits for “our” school board members as well as for “our” county officials.
It's time to take our children back from the state.
Why am I adding my 2 cents worth? When someone takes $25,000 in additional taxes out of my pocket, I have earned the right to say anything I please.
Barry L. Phillips
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.