At South Hills Interfaith Ministries (SHIM), we are always amazed by the support of our local communities, but never more than now. Generous friends and supporters of SHIM raised just over $85,000 and collected more than 11,000 pounds of groceries for the SHIM food pantries during the first “Sack Hunger” campaign, which will be an annual event.
We are awed, inspired and very, very grateful.
For over 40 years, SHIM has been serving vulnerable families throughout the South Hills. Our two food pantries help more than 450 local families put food on the table each month, while our financial literacy, employment support and youth development programs enable families to move toward self-sufficiency. There are thousands of families right here in our community that are struggling to get by. Fortunately, this incredible community takes care of its own.
During the six weeks of the Sack Hunger campaign, more than 30 local groups hosted food drives to help fill our pantry shelves, while more than 450 individuals stepped forward with financial contributions. We are grateful to BNY Mellon for matching the first $25,000 donated to the Sack Hunger campaign.
On behalf of the families we serve, thank you so much for being part of something wonderful and for helping SHIM to “Sack Hunger.” Your support makes all the difference for our neighbors in need.
The writer is executive director of South Hills Interfaith Ministries (shim-center.org).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Why the difference?
- Arnold must cut police force
- Pa.’s ‘safety laws’
- No ‘pass’ for Obama
- Right to veto
- PETA & its tactics II
- Uncaring toward soldiers
- PETA & its tactics I
- Being a volunteer firefighter