ShareThis Page

Consequences in space

| Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Regarding the “This Just In” item “Cold War II: NASA breaks contact with Russians” : I had mentioned this to my liberal and progressive acquaintances a few years ago regarding President Obama dismantling NASA so that we can share the space station and hitch a ride with the Russians into space.

“What's the big deal?” they asked.

My response was, “What if we get into it with Russia over something?”

Well, now what?

We have no heavy-lift boosters to get anything of real weight into orbit. In addition, we have no technology left to get up to the International Space Station to make sure we keep our vested interest up there if the Russians say, “All the tickets are sold for the next 10 years up to ISS — oops, I'm sorry.”

Another problem will be, “Gee, how did the Chinese plant their flag on the moon and tell us to go pound salt?” They'll have access to all the raw minerals on the moon as well as an important strategic base.

If someone had tried to dream this up in 1969, he would have been laughed off the face of the Earth. Well, at least we all supposedly have health insurance. We'll need it when others control space.

And so it goes.

Pete Mamula


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.