An important child protection bill sponsored by state Sen. Randy Vulakovich, R-Shaler, was signed into law recently with bipartisan support. It updates Pennsylvania's outdated system for tracking child abuse complaints by creating a statewide database to help authorities more efficiently and effectively receive and respond to reports of abuse and neglect.
For years, Pennsylvania's child abuse hotline center has used U.S. mail to send information on abuse reports to authorities — an expensive and slow process. Sen. Vulakovich's bill allows this critical information to be shared electronically through secure technology, enabling authorities to respond more quickly.
The database will enable appropriate information to be maintained confidentially on suspected incidents of child abuse and reports of child neglect. This will help authorities be more effective in their response if additional reports are made involving the same individuals.
Vulakovich should be congratulated for championing this critical new law. Because of the bipartisan work he and his colleagues have done, children across our commonwealth will be safer.
The writer is government relations director of Pennsylvania Partnerships for Children (papartnerships.org).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Seek ‘post-combustion future’
- Hazardous ride
- Terrorism & immigration
- View from Florida
- Beyond wacky
- Don’t forget Highmark patients
- ‘Sin’ that saved lives
- Perk in peril?
- Follow King’s words
- Rethink NFL fandom
- More simply put