Bloomberg & coal
To Michael Bloomberg, former New York City mayor: You gave $50 million to the Sierra Club for its “Beyond Coal” campaign, which has the single purpose of terminating the use of coal in America. As a result of these combined efforts, hundreds of thousands of coal mining jobs, and secondary jobs dependent on them, have now been eliminated in some of the most depressed areas of our country.
Recently, you were quoted by CNN Money as saying that you give “a lot of money to the Sierra Club” to close coal-fired power plants, but you added that we have to “have some compassion to do it gently.” If you said this, Mr. Bloomberg, you are insincere, insulting and hypocritical!
You made your money in the financial markets off of other people. American coal miners earn their living from hard work by which they produce the lowest-cost electricity in America. They just want to earn a living for their families in honor and dignity, and you have destroyed thousands of these families' livelihoods.
Already in 2014, we have experienced electric power shortages and huge increases in the costs of electricity and natural gas as a result of your closure of 392 coal-fired power plants producing nearly 100,000 megawatts of our lowest-cost electricity. Families at the lower economic levels bear the brunt of these cost increases resulting from your efforts.
Liberal elitists such as you are destroying low-cost electricity, so many lives and our great country for no global environmental benefit whatsoever. This is downright evil.
Robert E. Murray
St. Clairsville, Ohio
The writer is chairman, president and CEO of Murray Energy Corp.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Animal abuse
- Food for thought
- Poisoned long ago
- Appreciate caregivers
- EPA not the problem
- Bible under attack
- Trophy shot trumps learning
- Voting insanity
- Gruber, then & now I
- Enforce immigration laws
- Give thanks for vets