Voting rights bill
The League of Women Voters of Greater Pittsburgh commends the introduction of bipartisan legislation, the Voter Registration Amendment Act, which offers common-sense fixes designed to modernize the Voting Rights Act.
This legislation was carefully crafted to protect the rights of all voters from discrimination and repair the damage to the Voting Rights Act of 1965 inflicted by the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Shelby v. Holder. The Sensenbrenner bill seeks to better protect all voters against discrimination at the ballot box and ensure Americans are guaranteed their right to vote. The League of Women Voters of Greater Pittsburgh urges Congress to pass the bill swiftly.
The bipartisan introduction of these protections is an important step to create modern, common-sense fixes to protect everyone's right to vote and make sure that our elections are free, fair and accessible for every American.
The LWVGP has a long history of protecting the vote, including being the lead plaintiff in the recent court case against Pennsylvania's Voter ID law. It's about all of us coming together to affirm that everyone should have an equal right to vote.
The writer is co-president of the League of Women Voters of Greater Pittsburgh.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Blame judges
- Hiring in Westmoreland I
- Hiring in Westmoreland II
- Mitochondrial disease awareness
- Atheists & religious expression
- Article painted wrong picture
- Show appreciation
- Thomas’ ‘humanity’
- ‘Trust’ in God
- Fitz draws ire
- Pols’ real interest