Labor unions are disliked by employers. Companies move to get away from organized workers. Corporations build new plants where there are no unions.
Why, then, do the people working for our tax dollars, not for for-profit companies, and paid with our taxes have the strongest, richest labor unions?
The people who work in the private sector's for-profit industries are constantly belittled for attempting to join or form a labor union, but our civil-servant unions are getting stronger every day.
Plus, the workers who are fought against about forming or belonging to a union keep paying more and more taxes to pay civil servants who have unions.
Is this right? Should everyone stop making, inventing and selling things, and become servants?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Rushing to judge
- Foley & Obama I
- Foley & Obama II
- Self-serving & corrupt
- LED sign: Negative ad
- Bring back ‘eagle cam’
- Life Care Center a jewel
- Oberdorf firing incomprehensible
- Failing city, Steelers