Stronger with legalization?
We live in America — a land where freedom reigns and we are not subjected to extreme political oppression. Technology has given us a host of conveniences to make our daily lives much easier.
Despite all this, we feel we are living in a stressful time, full of economic pressures, social inequities and a whole spectrum of uncertainties.
We worry, now, about an old phenomenon called “bullying,” and probably correctly so. We all are being bullied. In politics, both left and right attempt to put in us the fear of God — or at least the fear of dire consequences if we do not vote for them. Drug companies insist we ask our doctors if their products should be prescribed for us in spite of all their nasty side effects — including, sometimes, death. Self-interest groups, among them some from minorities of race, religion, even sexual preference, accuse us of mistreating them and often they employ some tactics that would make a bully proud.
So, in this troubled nation, how are we going to set things right ? How best to solve the vexing troubles of our land? Well, currently a slim majority would opt for making marijuana legal. That way, we all could smoke it up and get relief from all the pressures that we feel.
How do you think that will work, America? Will it make our nation stronger?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- LCB: Asset to modernize
- Appalling advice
- ‘Affordable’? Not for him
- Wrong on immigration I
- Protesters not law-abiding
- Library funds
- A buck to pass?
- NFL player protest wrong
- Pass GMO label bill
- Report reactions III
- ATI’s broken promises