Gas drilling's benefits
President Obama has underscored the urgency of revitalizing our nation's manufacturing base, especially in regions like ours where this sector — and the communities it supports — have struggled for far too long. As we know, our region's workforce is second to none. Now — driven by tightly regulated shale development — a brighter, more promising future is within reach.
We are very pleased that's the message that Obama once again delivered during his recent visit to our region. As the president stated, shale has “changed the paradigm of manufacturing,” adding: “It's cheaper to manufacture in the United States than it is in Europe and/or in Asia.”
Consumers, struggling with sluggish employment opportunities, are benefiting too. “We produce more natural gas than anyone — and nearly everyone's energy bill is lower because of it,” the president has stated.
He's absolutely right, and as the Obama administration has made clear, safe shale production “has contributed in large measure to a reduction in CO2 emissions,” which are now at a 20-year low. At the same time, shale is generating huge amounts of impact fees and tax revenues for local economies across Pennsylvania.
We are encouraged by the president's strong support of American natural gas, which is boosting our economy, protecting our environment and strengthening our national security.
The writer is president of the Marcellus Shale Coalition (marcelluscoalition.org).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Animal abuse
- Food for thought
- Poisoned long ago
- Appreciate caregivers
- The real big spenders
- Trophy shot trumps learning
- EPA not the problem
- Speak up on illegals
- Bible under attack
- Gruber, then & now III