When a president repeatedly violates the Constitution (like unilaterally making changes to laws), the remedy under the Constitution is impeachment.
I recently heard a constitutional expert, when asked if all of Obama's violations of the Constitution warranted impeachment, reply by asking what the questioner meant by “all,” and how about any one of them?
Imagine if any other president had committed just one of these violations. Does anyone believe he would have been allowed to remain in office? Richard Nixon, anyone?
So why hasn't Congress taken any action? Because, generally speaking, we have garbage representing us. Those whose duty is to uphold the Constitution are more concerned with preserving their little fiefdoms.
And how did this come to be? Because, for too long, too many people have been apathetic and therefore have not held their elected representatives accountable.
And they don't seem to realize that the fruit of apathy is tyranny.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.